Comparison · NCT01699789-sae
Resources for Services RS vs Community Engagement and Planning CEP: serious adverse events
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Download JSON
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Resources for Services RS vs Community Engagement and Planning CEP: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01699789-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01699789-sae
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0063 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00597 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0 | -0.00597 | 0.0063 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a group has no participants with the outcome | |||
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a cell of the two-by-two table is zero | |||
| Number needed to harm | from the risk difference interval | the two groups' risks are equal |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Resources for Services RS | RS offers time-limited technical assistance to individual agencies and outreach from a community engagement specialty, to review components of the QI Program Intervention as implemented by the RS Expert Team.~QI Program: The QI program is an evidence-based toolkit that supported team leadership, case and care management, medication management, and CBT for depression. The Case management manual supported depression screening and tracking of outcomes; patient education and activation, care coordination, and behavioral activation and problem solving. The toolkit includes education on depression and a community health worker manual. The expert team for RS consisted of 3 psychiatrists, a psychologist expert in CBT, a nurse care manager, a community engagement specialist, a QI expert, and staff support. The team offered 12 webinars to each community on components of collaborative care as well as site visits to primary care clinics on clinical assessment and medication management. | 0 | 606 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Community Engagement and Planning CEP | CEP supports 4 months of planning for the CEP Council of representatives from assigned programs in biweekly 2-hr meetings to fit trainings in the QI Program to the community and develop strategies across programs to collaborate as a network. The CEP Council developed a written plan for training and monitoring and supported implementation of the training plan. CEP sites received enrolled client lists. The toolkit is the same as RS. The CEP Council was supported by a workbook developed by the overall CPIC Council that provided principles, approach, agendas, and resources for the multi-sector planning meetings. The CEP Councils met twice a month for 4-6 months to develop their plan and met monthly during implementation of trainings. The study Council supported CEP meetings. Community leaders co-led trainings with study experts to help assure sustainability. Each CEP council had $15K to defray costs of venues, materials, and consultations, while the study provided that for RS. | 0 | 640 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, serious adverse events
- Time frame
Mortality data obtained from back up contact person identified by participants in prior survey periods. The suicidal ideation within the last two weeks data was collected over the 12 months study duration.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Community Partners in Care is a Research Project Funded by the National Institutes of Health
- NCT number
- NCT01699789
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Depression, Information Dissemination, Social Determinants of Health
- Interventions
- Quality Improvement Program, Resources for Services Expert Team, Community Engagement and Planning Council
- Lead sponsor
- RAND
- Results first posted
- 2014-11-17
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01699789?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01699789-sae