Comparison · NCT01751906-3bcae4d7
Absorb BVS vs XIENCE: Landmark Analysis on TLF and Components
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Absorb BVS vs XIENCE: Landmark Analysis on TLF and Components. Trial comparisons, record NCT01751906-3bcae4d7. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01751906-3bcae4d7
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0316 | 0.0231 | 0.0431 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0262 | 0.0162 | 0.0422 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.00538 | -0.0127 | 0.0206 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.21 | 0.678 | 2.14 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.21 | 0.67 | 2.19 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Absorb BVS than on XIENCE | 186 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Absorb BVS | Subjects receiving Absorb BVS~Absorb BVS: • Scaffold diameters: 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 mm~* Scaffold lengths: 8, 12, 18, and 28 mm The 3.0 x 18 mm Absorb BVS will be used for the Lead-In. Both the 8 mm and 12 mm lengths will be available for the 2.5/3.0 mm diameter Absorb BVS. Only the 12 mm length will be available for the 3.5 mm diameter.~* The commercially approved CE marked device will be used in geographies where it is commercially available. The commercially approved CE marked 23mm Absorb BVS device will not be used in this study.~Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation for improving coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm. | 38 | 1,202 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | XIENCE | Subjects receiving XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, or XIENCE Xpedition~XIENCE: Commercially approved XIENCE Family Stent System, inclusive of XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, XIENCE Xpedition, XIENCE Alpine, XIENCE Pro (OUS only), and XIENCE ProX (OUS only).~* Stent diameters: 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, 3.5 and 4.0 mm~* Stent lengths: 8, 12, 15, 18, 23, and 28 mm. The 3.25 mm is only available for XIENCE Xpedition~* For geographies where these devices are commercially available, the investigational sties may use only their locally approved devices~To improve coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm. | 16 | 610 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED
- Title
- Landmark Analysis on TLF and Components
- Description
TLF is defined as composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction (per protocol-defined MI definition), attributable to Target Vessel (TVMI), or Ischemic-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR).
- Time frame
- 3-4 years
- Population
- ITT set. The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- ABSORB III Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
- NCT number
- NCT01751906
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis, Coronary Disease, Coronary Stenosis
- Interventions
- Absorb BVS, XIENCE
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Results first posted
- 2018-02-13
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01751906?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01751906-3bcae4d7