ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01825512-9fa26f0a

Deferiprone vs Deferasirox: Percentage of Successfully Chelated Patients

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Deferiprone vs Deferasirox: Percentage of Successfully Chelated Patients. Trial comparisons, record NCT01825512-9fa26f0a. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01825512-9fa26f0a

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5520.4650.636wilson
Risk in group 20.5480.4670.626wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00405-0.1130.121newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.8121.25log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.020.6291.64log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Deferiprone than on Deferasirox247from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Deferiprone75-100 mg/kg/day seven days per week~Deferiprone: Deferiprone 80 mg/mL oral solution69125OG000
Group 2Deferasirox20 to 40 mg/kg/day seven days per week~Deferasirox: Deferasirox is used at the following dosage strengths: 125 mg, 250 mg and 500 mg80146OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Percentage of Successfully Chelated Patients
Description
Percentage of successfully chelated patients is assessed by serum ferritin levels (in all patients) and cardiac MRI T2\* (in patients above 10 years of age able to perform an MRI scan without sedation)
Time frame
at baseline and after 12 months
Population
Per-protocol population 1 (PP1): number of patients for whom the primary composite efficacy endpoint data were available at baseline and after 1 year of treatment (271 subjects)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy/Safety Study of Deferiprone Compared to Deferasirox in Paediatric Patients
NCT number
NCT01825512
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Chronic Iron Overload
Interventions
Deferiprone, Deferasirox
Lead sponsor
Consorzio per Valutazioni Biologiche e Farmacologiche
Results first posted
2021-04-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01825512-9fa26f0a