ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01864018-sae

Phase I/II, Cohort A vs Phase II, Cohort B: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Phase I/II, Cohort A vs Phase II, Cohort B: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01864018-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01864018-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3330.2170.475wilson
Risk in group 20.4290.280.591wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0952-0.2960.11newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7780.4471.35log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6670.2711.64log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Phase I/II, Cohort A than on Phase II, Cohort B10.5from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Phase I/II, Cohort AQuestionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies1648EG000
Group 2Phase II, Cohort BQuestionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies1535EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
5 years

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Ixazomib With Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma or Light Chain Amyloidosis
NCT number
NCT01864018
Phases
PHASE1, PHASE2
Conditions
Amyloidosis, Plasma Cell Myeloma
Interventions
Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib Citrate, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Pharmacological Study, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Results first posted
2022-09-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01864018-sae