ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01874665-sae

Cohort A vs Cohort B: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cohort A vs Cohort B: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01874665-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01874665-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.6670.4880.808wilson
Risk in group 20.40.1980.643wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.267-0.03470.513newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.670.8533.26log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 230.83310.8log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Cohort A than on Cohort B3.75from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Cohort AParticipants with KIT exon 11-mutant GIST ponatinib: 45 mg, taken orally once-daily.2030EG000
Group 2Cohort BParticipants with GIST that lack KIT exon 11 mutations (Cohort B) ponatinib: 45 mg, taken orally once-daily.615EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are adverse events that started after the first dose of study drug and no more than 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 3 years)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Participants With Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
NCT number
NCT01874665
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
GIST
Interventions
Ponatinib
Lead sponsor
Ariad Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2016-05-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01874665-sae