ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01925014-85ba4ab3

Low-dose CT vs Standard-dose CT: Prevalence of Non-perforated Appendicitis

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Low-dose CT vs Standard-dose CT: Prevalence of Non-perforated Appendicitis. Trial comparisons, record NCT01925014-85ba4ab3. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01925014-85ba4ab3

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2230.2030.244wilson
Risk in group 20.2520.2310.274wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0293-0.05930.000781newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8840.7781log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.850.721log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Low-dose CT than on Standard-dose CT34.1from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Low-dose CT2 millisievert3421,535OG000
Group 2Standard-dose CT8 millisievert or lower3881,539OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Prevalence of Non-perforated Appendicitis
Description
The percentage (i.e., prevalence) of non-perforated appendicitis among all randomized cases. In January, 2016, when more than 2000 patients were enrolled, the data and safety monitoring board noted a between-group imbalance in the number of appendectomies. Because of the concern that such an imbalance might potentially jeopardize the comparability for the prespecified endpoints, the study protocol was amended to adopt the following additional secondary endpoints, which were assessed among all randomly assigned patients: the number of appendectomies, number of negative appendectomies, prevalence of perforated appendicitis, and prevalence of non-perforated appendicitis.
Time frame
1 week after surgery
Population
Intention-to-treat.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Low vs. Standard Dose CT for Appendicitis Trial
NCT number
NCT01925014
Phases
NA
Conditions
Appendicitis
Interventions
Diagnostic CT with low-dose radiation, Diagnostic CT with standard-dose radiation
Lead sponsor
Kyoung Ho Lee, MD
Results first posted
2019-01-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01925014-85ba4ab3