ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01925014-89c938af

Low-dose CT vs Standard-dose CT: Need for Additional Imaging Test(s)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Low-dose CT vs Standard-dose CT: Need for Additional Imaging Test(s). Trial comparisons, record NCT01925014-89c938af. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01925014-89c938af

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.02540.01860.0345wilson
Risk in group 20.02660.01970.0359wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00123-0.01270.0102newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9540.6191.47log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9520.6111.49log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Low-dose CT than on Standard-dose CT811from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Low-dose CT2 millisievert391,535OG000
Group 2Standard-dose CT8 millisievert or lower411,539OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Need for Additional Imaging Test(s)
Description
The proportion of patients requiring additional imaging test(s) in order to diagnose or rule out appendicitis.
Time frame
1 week after CT
Population
Intention-to-treat.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Low vs. Standard Dose CT for Appendicitis Trial
NCT number
NCT01925014
Phases
NA
Conditions
Appendicitis
Interventions
Diagnostic CT with low-dose radiation, Diagnostic CT with standard-dose radiation
Lead sponsor
Kyoung Ho Lee, MD
Results first posted
2019-01-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01925014-89c938af