ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01952418-434101a7

Standard Monitor (24) vs Large Monitor (32): Polyp Detection Rate (Screening Exams Only)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Standard Monitor (24) vs Large Monitor (32): Polyp Detection Rate (Screening Exams Only). Trial comparisons, record NCT01952418-434101a7. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01952418-434101a7

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2790.2410.32wilson
Risk in group 20.3010.2630.341wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0217-0.07730.0342newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9280.7651.13log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.90.6861.18log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Standard Monitor (24) than on Large Monitor (32)46from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Standard Monitor (24)Endoscopists in this arm will perform colonoscopy using the standard size video monitor (24).137491OG000
Group 2Large Monitor (32)Subjects randomized to this group will perform colonoscopy while viewing a large video monitor (32).157522OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Polyp Detection Rate (Screening Exams Only)
Description
Number of patients with polyps detected
Time frame
recorded during endoscopy (immediate)
Population
screening exams only

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Effect of Video Monitor Size on Adenoma Detection Rate
NCT number
NCT01952418
Phases
NA
Conditions
Colon Adenoma
Interventions
Monitor size
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Results first posted
2017-04-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01952418-434101a7