ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01996241-aeb9954f

SC/ST Girls in Intervention Village Cluster vs SC/ST Girls in Control Village Cluster: Number of Participants Passing 10th Standard [Pass 10th Standard Exam]

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. SC/ST Girls in Intervention Village Cluster vs SC/ST Girls in Control Village Cluster: Number of Participants Passing 10th Standard [Pass 10th Standard Exam]. Trial comparisons, record NCT01996241-aeb9954f. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01996241-aeb9954f

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5680.5360.6wilson
Risk in group 20.6050.5720.637wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.037-0.08240.00862newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9390.8681.01log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8580.7111.04log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on SC/ST Girls in Intervention Village Cluster than on SC/ST Girls in Control Village Cluster27from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1SC/ST Girls in Intervention Village ClusterAll SC/ST girls in cohort 2 in final year of primary school living in intervention villages518912OG000
Group 2SC/ST Girls in Control Village ClusterAll SC/ST girls in cohort 2 in final year of primary school living in control villages530876OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants Passing 10th Standard [Pass 10th Standard Exam]
Description
This outcome will be assessed using data collected from all study participants at end-line, using the face-to-face questionnaire.
Time frame
May-August 2016 (cohort one) and May-August 2017 (cohort two)
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Evaluation of an Intervention for Adolescent Girls in Karnataka
NCT number
NCT01996241
Phases
NA
Conditions
Secondary School Entry and Completion, Child Marriage
Interventions
Multi-level, structural and norms-based intervention
Lead sponsor
Karnataka Health Promotion Trust
Results first posted
2019-09-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01996241-aeb9954f