Comparison · NCT02010151-ee6e1143
Conventional Dispatcher CPR vs NAD-CPR: Number of Participants With Good Neurological Recovery
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Conventional Dispatcher CPR vs NAD-CPR: Number of Participants With Good Neurological Recovery. Trial comparisons, record NCT02010151-ee6e1143. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02010151-ee6e1143
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0454 | 0.036 | 0.0571 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0825 | 0.0704 | 0.0966 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.0372 | -0.0541 | -0.0202 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.55 | 0.415 | 0.729 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.529 | 0.392 | 0.712 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Conventional Dispatcher CPR than on NAD-CPR | 26.9 | 18.5 | 49.4 | from the risk difference interval |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Conventional Dispatcher CPR | patients enrolled in period that conventional dispatcher CPR was provided to the patients. | 68 | 1,498 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | NAD-CPR | patients enrolled in period that NAD-CPR was provided to the patients. | 140 | 1,696 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Number of Participants With Good Neurological Recovery
- Description
- Cerebral performance category 1 or 2 is defined as good neurological recovery. we compared the good neurological recovery rate between before intervention period and intervention period.
- Time frame
- discharge time from first admission from emergency department within 2 month
- Population
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Dispatcher-Activated Neighborhood Access Defibrillation and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- NCT number
- NCT02010151
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- Interventions
- NAD-CPR
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Results first posted
- 2020-03-30
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02010151?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02010151-ee6e1143