ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02020018-87e92ce8

Prospective Group vs Retrospective Arm: Wound Infection After Open Heart Surgery

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Prospective Group vs Retrospective Arm: Wound Infection After Open Heart Surgery. Trial comparisons, record NCT02020018-87e92ce8. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02020018-87e92ce8

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01470.005730.0372wilson
Risk in group 20.01060.006660.017wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00406-0.006920.0269newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.380.4684.07log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.390.4634.15log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Prospective Group than on Retrospective Arm246from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Prospective GroupNegative pressure wound therapy (Prevena Incision Management System) applied immediately postoperatively.4272OG000
Group 2Retrospective ArmConventional sterile dry wound dressing applied immediately postoperatively.171,597OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Wound Infection After Open Heart Surgery
Description
The total number of participants with surgical site infections after cardiac surgery.
Time frame
30 days post-surgery
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Prevention of Poststernotomy Infection
NCT number
NCT02020018
Phases
NA
Conditions
Surgical Wound Infection
Interventions
Prevena Incision Management System, Conventional sterile dry wound dressing
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Results first posted
2019-11-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02020018-87e92ce8