ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02021318-f42bb825

Roxadustat vs Darbepoetin Alfa: Number of Participants Who Received Rescue Therapy (Composite of RBC Transfusions (All Participants) and Darbepoetin Alfa Use (Roxadustat Treated Participants Only)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Roxadustat vs Darbepoetin Alfa: Number of Participants Who Received Rescue Therapy (Composite of RBC Transfusions (All Participants) and Darbepoetin Alfa Use (Roxadustat Treated Participants Only). Trial comparisons, record NCT02021318-f42bb825. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02021318-f42bb825

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1430.1090.185wilson
Risk in group 20.09590.06720.135wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.047-0.004940.0982newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.490.9572.32log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.570.9542.59log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Roxadustat than on Darbepoetin Alfa21.3from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Roxadustat
Participants received roxadustat orally according to the tiered weight-based approach, with starting dose of 70 mg given TIW to participants weighing between 45 kg up to 70 kg and 100 mg given TIW to participants weighing more than 70 kg up to 160 kg. Dose-titration was performed based upon regular measurement of Hb levels until participants achieved central Hb value of \>= 11.0 g/dL and Hb increase from baseline of \>= 1.0 g/dL at two consecutive study visits, separated by at least 5 days. Once target Hb level was reached participants entered maintenance period during which roxadustat dosage was adjusted every 4 weeks to maintain participants Hb level within the target range of 10.0 g/dL and 12.0 g/dL. Participants received roxadustat for up to a maximum of 104 weeks.
46322OG000
Group 2Darbepoetin Alfa
Participants received initial dose of darbepoetin alfa based upon the weight \[either 0.45 mcg/kg of body weight, as a single subcutaneous or IV injection once weekly or 0.75 mcg/kg of body weight, as a single subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks\] as per EU SmPC along with IV iron supplementation according to the standard of care. Dose-adjustment was performed based upon regular measurement of Hb levels until participants achieved central Hb value of \>= 11.0 g/dL and Hb increase from baseline of \>= 1.0 g/dL at two consecutive study visits, separated by at least 5 days. Once target Hb level was reached participants entered maintenance period during which darbepoetin alfa dosage was adjusted every 4 weeks to maintain participants Hb level within the target range of 10.0 g/dL and 12.0 g/dL. Participants received darbepoetin alfa for up to a maximum of 104 weeks.
28292OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants Who Received Rescue Therapy (Composite of RBC Transfusions (All Participants) and Darbepoetin Alfa Use (Roxadustat Treated Participants Only)
Description
Rescue therapy for participants in the roxadustat group included RBC transfusion or ESA therapy and for participants in the darbepoetin alfa group included RBC transfusion only. Participants were analyzed during the efficacy emergent period. The efficacy emergent period was defined as the evaluation period from the analysis date of first dose intake up to EOT Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period). For participants who have experienced more than one use of rescue therapy (i.e. RBC and ESA), only their first event was used.
Time frame
Baseline to EOT (up to week 104)
Population
The analysis population was the FAS.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Roxadustat in the Treatment of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Patients, Not on Dialysis, in Comparison to Darbepoetin Alfa
NCT number
NCT02021318
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease in Non-dialysis Patients
Interventions
Roxadustat, Darbepoetin alfa
Lead sponsor
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Results first posted
2021-03-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02021318-f42bb825