ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02096354-b4217c2a

RRx-001 Followed by Irinotecan vs Regorafenib Followed by Irinotecan: Clinical Benefit Rate

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. RRx-001 Followed by Irinotecan vs Regorafenib Followed by Irinotecan: Clinical Benefit Rate. Trial comparisons, record NCT02096354-b4217c2a. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02096354-b4217c2a

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7080.5080.851wilson
Risk in group 20.40.1680.687wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.308-0.04180.58newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.770.7953.95log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 23.640.7817log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on RRx-001 Followed by Irinotecan than on Regorafenib Followed by Irinotecan3.24from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1RRx-001 Followed by IrinotecanOnce-weekly intravenous RRx-001 at a dose of 4 mg on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab)1724OG000
Group 2Regorafenib Followed by IrinotecanRegorafenib daily on Days 1- 21 of a 4-week cycle. On progression and if eligible, patients will receive irinotecan (with or without bevacizumab)410OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Clinical Benefit Rate
Description
The period from study entry through Disease Control. Disease Control Rate (DCR) also correlates to Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR or SD relative to the total number of treated subjects
Time frame
Up to 2 years
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label Study of RRx-001 vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT number
NCT02096354
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Colorectal Neoplasms
Interventions
RRx-001, Regorafenib, Irinotecan
Lead sponsor
EpicentRx, Inc.
Results first posted
2024-10-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02096354-b4217c2a