Comparison · NCT02096900-sae
Midazolam vs Zolpidem: serious adverse events
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Midazolam vs Zolpidem: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02096900-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02096900-sae
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0918 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0838 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0 | -0.0838 | 0.0918 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a group has no participants with the outcome | |||
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a cell of the two-by-two table is zero | |||
| Number needed to harm | from the risk difference interval | the two groups' risks are equal |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Midazolam | midazolam was given at 0.5mg/kg, pre-operatively single dose | 0 | 38 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Zolpidem | zolpidem was given orally 0.25mg/kg pre-operatively single dose | 0 | 42 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, serious adverse events
- Time frame
- Adverse event data were collected during the study participation time which was about one day for each subject.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- A Comparison of Midazolam and Zolpidem as Oral Premedication in Children
- NCT number
- NCT02096900
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Parental/Caregiver Anxiety, Child's Anxiety
- Interventions
- zolpidem, Midazolam
- Lead sponsor
- Loma Linda University
- Results first posted
- 2017-08-11
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02096900?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02096900-sae