Comparison · NCT02101359-sae
T2380 vs Reference Group: serious adverse events
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. T2380 vs Reference Group: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02101359-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02101359-sae
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0136 | 0.00529 | 0.0343 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0203 | 0.00932 | 0.0435 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.00671 | -0.0314 | 0.0168 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.669 | 0.191 | 2.35 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.664 | 0.186 | 2.38 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on T2380 than on Reference Group | 149 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | T2380 | T2380: Intracameral administration during surgery | 4 | 295 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Reference Group | Mydriatics and anesthetic: Topical treatments used the day of surgery | 6 | 296 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, serious adverse events
- Time frame
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Intracameral Injection of T2380 in Cataract Surgery
- NCT number
- NCT02101359
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Interventions
- T2380, Mydriatics, Tetracaine
- Lead sponsor
- Laboratoires Thea
- Results first posted
- 2014-09-25
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02101359?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02101359-sae