ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02135419-8f69b74e

Arm I (Treatment) vs Arm II (Active Monitoring) (Closed Since SEP2021): Incidence of Adverse Events for Each Treatment

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Arm I (Treatment) vs Arm II (Active Monitoring) (Closed Since SEP2021): Incidence of Adverse Events for Each Treatment. Trial comparisons, record NCT02135419-8f69b74e. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02135419-8f69b74e

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1870.1710.204wilson
Risk in group 20.1930.1770.21wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00653-0.02960.0165newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9660.8561.09log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9580.8251.11log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Arm I (Treatment) than on Arm II (Active Monitoring) (Closed Since SEP2021)153from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Arm I (Treatment)
Patients are directed to receive either topical or ablative treatment at the discretion of the clinician. Patients receiving topical treatment apply imiquimod intra-anally, peri-anally or both thrice weekly for up to 16 weeks, fluorouracil twice daily for 5 days every 2 weeks for up to 16 weeks, or trichloroacetic acid every 3 weeks up to 12 weeks. Patients receiving ablative treatment using infrared photocoagulation therapy, hyfrecation/electrocautery (thermal ablation therapy), or laser therapy. Patients may undergo excision under anesthesia if the clinician believes none of the other treatment approaches will be effective. The number and timing of such treatments will be at the discretion of the investigator. Patients with persistent HSIL should continue a protocol-approved treatment or a new protocol treatment should be considered. All participants will have samples collected for laboratory biomarker analysis.~imiquimod: Applied topically~fluorouracil: Applied topically~infrared photocoagulation therapy: Undergo infrared coagulation~thermal ablation therapy: Undergo hyfrecation/electrocautery therapy~laser therapy: Undergo laser therapy~clinical observation: Undergo active monitoring (High Resolution Anoscopy \[HRA\]) with biopsies~laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
4162,227OG000
Group 2Arm II (Active Monitoring) (Closed Since SEP2021)
Patients undergo active monitoring with examinations for clinical observation every 6 months. Every 12 months, patients undergo biopsies of visible lesions. Patients have cytology sampling performed at every visit. All participants will have samples collected for laboratory biomarker analysis.~clinical observation: Undergo active monitoring (High Resolution Anoscopy \[HRA\]) with biopsies~laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies
4292,219OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Incidence of Adverse Events for Each Treatment
Description
Participants who had at least one adverse event (serious or non-serious)
Time frame
Up to 5 years after randomization
Population
Participants who received assigned intervention

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Treatment in Preventing Anal Cancer in Patients With HIV and Anal High-Grade Lesions
NCT number
NCT02135419
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Anal Cancer, High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, HIV Infection, Human Papilloma Virus Infection
Interventions
imiquimod, fluorouracil, infrared photocoagulation therapy, thermal ablation therapy, laser therapy, clinical observation, laboratory biomarker analysis
Lead sponsor
AIDS Malignancy Consortium
Results first posted
2022-12-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02135419-8f69b74e