ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02148705-3a1facc3

NexoBrid Gel vs Standard of Care (SOC): Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Surgical Excision Performed or Eschar Removal for NexoBrid vs SOC (FAS)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. NexoBrid Gel vs Standard of Care (SOC): Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Surgical Excision Performed or Eschar Removal for NexoBrid vs SOC (FAS). Trial comparisons, record NCT02148705-3a1facc3. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02148705-3a1facc3

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.040.01370.111wilson
Risk in group 20.720.610.809wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.68-0.773-0.549newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.05560.01820.17log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.01620.00460.0571log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on NexoBrid Gel than on Standard of Care (SOC)1.471.291.82from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard of care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1NexoBrid GelNexoBrid Gel is applied to the burn wound at a dose of 2 g NexoBrid sterile powder mixed with 20g sterile Gel Vehicle per 1% of TBSA (\~ surface of an adult palm) for four hours.~NexoBrid375OG000
Group 2Standard of Care (SOC)Subjects in the SOC group may be treated with a combination of surgical and non-surgical eschar removal procedures, according to the investigator's judgment.~Standard of Care (SOC)5475OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Secondary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Surgical Excision Performed or Eschar Removal for NexoBrid vs SOC (FAS)
Description
Comparison of NexoBrid over SOC in number of Participants with surgical need for excisional eschar removal as measured by an analysis of incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential/ minor/ avulsion/ Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision).
Time frame
Post application (post 2 h soaking) for NexoBrid arm and immediately post surgical excision for SOC arm.
Population
Gel arm is not involved in comparison as defined in the statistical analysis plan. Only NexoBrid and SOC

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of NexoBrid in Subjects With Thermal Burns
NCT number
NCT02148705
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Thermal Burns
Interventions
NexoBrid, Standard of Care (SOC), Gel Vehicle
Lead sponsor
MediWound Ltd
Results first posted
2023-06-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02148705-3a1facc3