ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02153528-b4cf907f

Standard TB Treatment vs Double Rimfampicin: Proportion of Acquired Rifampicin Resistance Among Failures and Relapses

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Standard TB Treatment vs Double Rimfampicin: Proportion of Acquired Rifampicin Resistance Among Failures and Relapses. Trial comparisons, record NCT02153528-b4cf907f. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02153528-b4cf907f

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 1000.324wilson
Risk in group 200.00000000000000002780.242wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.2420.324newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treatfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Standard TB Treatment
Standard regimen for TB treatment according to guidelines of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease~Standard TB treatment: Standard regimen for TB treatment according to guidelines of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
08OG000
Group 2Double Rimfampicin
2HREZ/4HR Cat. 1, modified by using double dose rifampicin throughout~double rimfampicin: Compared to standard regimen dosing of rifampicin is doubled, while standard dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol are maintained
012OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Proportion of Acquired Rifampicin Resistance Among Failures and Relapses
Description
number of failure / relapse cases without mutation detected at diagnosis as the denominator and comparing intervention and control arms.
Time frame
12 months after end of TB treatment
Population
ITT analysis. This analysis only includes failure / relapse cases without mutation detected at diagnosis

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Optimization of the TB Treatment Regimen Cascade
NCT number
NCT02153528
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
Interventions
double rimfampicin, Standard TB treatment
Lead sponsor
Damien Foundation
Results first posted
2020-02-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02153528-b4cf907f