ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02153528-e395bf06

Double Rifampicin Arm Negative on Auramine Smear vs Double Rifampicin Group Negative on FDA Smear: the Negative Predictive Value of Conversion at 2 Weeks for Relapse.

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Double Rifampicin Arm Negative on Auramine Smear vs Double Rifampicin Group Negative on FDA Smear: the Negative Predictive Value of Conversion at 2 Weeks for Relapse. Trial comparisons, record NCT02153528-e395bf06. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02153528-e395bf06

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 1000.0405wilson
Risk in group 2000.0195wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.01950.0405newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treatfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Double Rifampicin Arm Negative on Auramine SmearThis outcome is only calculated for the intervention arm.091OG000
Group 2Double Rifampicin Group Negative on FDA SmearThis outcome is only analysed for the intervention arm.0193OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
the Negative Predictive Value of Conversion at 2 Weeks for Relapse.
Description
The Negative Predictive value (and 95% CI) of conversion in the intervention arm will be estimated as the % of relapses among those with a minimum 1 log decline in the number of AFB, or who are already negative or only scanty positive on AFB smear (auramine or FDA).
Time frame
at 2 weeks of treatment
Population
ITT analysis. This analysis only includes participants in the intervention arm who are negative on auramine smear resp. FDA smear at 2 weeks.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Optimization of the TB Treatment Regimen Cascade
NCT number
NCT02153528
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
Interventions
double rimfampicin, Standard TB treatment
Lead sponsor
Damien Foundation
Results first posted
2020-02-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02153528-e395bf06