Comparison · NCT02173379-15ac7ad4
Absorb BVS vs XIENCE: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Absorb BVS vs XIENCE: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR). Trial comparisons, record NCT02173379-15ac7ad4. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02173379-15ac7ad4
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0959 | 0.0804 | 0.114 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0683 | 0.0554 | 0.084 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0275 | 0.00552 | 0.0498 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.4 | 1.07 | 1.84 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.45 | 1.08 | 1.94 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Absorb BVS than on XIENCE | 36.3 | 20.1 | 181 | from the risk difference interval |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Absorb BVS | Subjects receiving Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) System, and the Absorb GT1™ BVS System | 114 | 1,189 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | XIENCE | Subjects receiving XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, XIENCE Xpedition, XIENCE Alpine, XIENCE Pro (outside of the US only) or XIENCE ProX (outside of the US only) | 82 | 1,200 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
- Description
TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be classified prospectively as ischemia driven or not ischemia driven by the investigator prior to repeat angiography.
- Time frame
- 5 years
- Population
- ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Absorb IV Randomized Controlled Trial
- NCT number
- NCT02173379
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis, Coronary Disease, Coronary Stenosis
- Interventions
- Absorb BVS, XIENCE
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Results first posted
- 2018-07-24
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02173379?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02173379-15ac7ad4