ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02205359-sae

aCRT ON vs aCRT OFF: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. aCRT ON vs aCRT OFF: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02205359-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02205359-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5920.5690.615wilson
Risk in group 20.5940.5710.616wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00154-0.03350.0305newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9970.9451.05log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9940.871.13log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on aCRT ON than on aCRT OFF651from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1aCRT ONThe aCRT algorithm has been developed to provide RV-synchronized LV pacing when intrinsic AV conduction is normal or BiV pacing otherwise~aCRT ON: CRT device with AdaptivCRT enabled1,0721,810EG000
Group 2aCRT OFFStandard CRT~aCRT OFF: CRT device with AdaptivCRT disabled1,0731,807EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
the data were collected from subject randomization until death or study completion, median follow-up 4.9 years (maximum follow-up 8.1 years)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
AdaptResponse Clinical Trial
NCT number
NCT02205359
Phases
NA
Conditions
Heart Failure With Left Bundle Branch Block
Interventions
aCRT ON, aCRT OFF
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Results first posted
2023-11-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02205359-sae