ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02273037-a77c66ed

Pinard vs Doppler: Identification of Abnormal Fetal Heart Rate

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Pinard vs Doppler: Identification of Abnormal Fetal Heart Rate. Trial comparisons, record NCT02273037-a77c66ed. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02273037-a77c66ed

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.0470.03540.0621wilson
Risk in group 20.07560.06070.0937wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0286-0.0501-0.00742newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.6210.4350.887log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6030.4130.88log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Pinard than on Doppler34.919.9135from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1PinardPinard Auscultation (standard of care)46979OG000
Group 2DopplerDoppler Auscultation (Intervention)75992OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Identification of Abnormal Fetal Heart Rate
Description
Compare the incidence of identification of abnormal fetal heart rate in labour in the Pinard and Doppler group.
Time frame
In labour
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Intermittent Auscultation Using Handheld Doppler: a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Perinatal Outcomes in Uganda
NCT number
NCT02273037
Phases
NA
Conditions
Stillbirth, Neonatal Death
Interventions
Fetal heart rate Doppler, Partograph
Lead sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children
Results first posted
2018-08-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02273037-a77c66ed