ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02284191-356332e4

CT Coronary Angiogram vs Standard Care: Coronary Revascularisation

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. CT Coronary Angiogram vs Standard Care: Coronary Revascularisation. Trial comparisons, record NCT02284191-356332e4. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02284191-356332e4

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3420.3110.374wilson
Risk in group 20.3310.30.363wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0114-0.03280.0556newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.030.9071.18log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.050.8631.28log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on CT Coronary Angiogram than on Standard Care87.6from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1CT Coronary AngiogramCT Coronary Angiogram plus standard care~CT Coronary Angiogram: Completion of a CT Coronary Angiogram300877OG000
Group 2Standard CareStandard care only288871OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Coronary Revascularisation
Description
Number of participants with Coronary revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, one year post randomisation
Time frame
1 year (post randomisation)
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Rapid Assessment of Potential Ischaemic Heart Disease With CTCA
NCT number
NCT02284191
Phases
NA
Conditions
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Interventions
CT Coronary Angiogram
Lead sponsor
University of Edinburgh
Results first posted
2024-08-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02284191-356332e4