ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02284191-sae

CT Coronary Angiogram vs Standard Care: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. CT Coronary Angiogram vs Standard Care: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02284191-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02284191-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.02050.0130.0322wilson
Risk in group 20.01150.006250.021wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00904-0.003080.0218newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.790.833.85log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.80.8283.93log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on CT Coronary Angiogram than on Standard Care111from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1CT Coronary AngiogramCT Coronary Angiogram plus standard care18877EG000
Group 2Standard CareStandard care only10871EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Protocol defined adverse events were recorded/reported from consent until 10 days after joining the study. Anticipated events which formed the study outcomes (e.g -death, MI) were recorded for one year post randomisation. No other events were recorded

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Rapid Assessment of Potential Ischaemic Heart Disease With CTCA
NCT number
NCT02284191
Phases
NA
Conditions
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Interventions
CT Coronary Angiogram
Lead sponsor
University of Edinburgh
Results first posted
2024-08-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02284191-sae