ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02284399-c67b08c3

IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014) vs IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010): Frequency of Positive Tests for Abnormal Karyotype Before and After the Adoption of NIPT Testing.

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014) vs IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010): Frequency of Positive Tests for Abnormal Karyotype Before and After the Adoption of NIPT Testing. Trial comparisons, record NCT02284399-c67b08c3. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02284399-c67b08c3

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1480.1360.161wilson
Risk in group 20.07360.06110.0883wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.07410.0550.0921newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 22.011.642.46log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.181.752.73log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014) than on IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010)13.510.918.2from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014)
Number of pregnant women who present to participating centers between January 2012-June 2014, after the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).~non-invasive prenatal testing procedure: Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) of fetal cell free DNA in maternal circulation
4543,074OG000
Group 2IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010)
A control group of pregnant women, prior to the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who present to participating centers between January 2010-June 2010 and are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
1041,414OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Frequency of Positive Tests for Abnormal Karyotype Before and After the Adoption of NIPT Testing.
Description
Will determine if frequency of positive tests for abnormal karyotypes between the control period and the study period where different.
Time frame
4 years
Population
The number of positive tests identified between the control and the test periods.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
National Prevalence and Impact of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
NCT number
NCT02284399
Phases
Conditions
Aneuploidy
Interventions
non-invasive prenatal testing
Lead sponsor
Obstetrix Medical Group
Results first posted
2019-06-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02284399-c67b08c3