ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02363322-sae

B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp vs A/Current Standard of Care Alone: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp vs A/Current Standard of Care Alone: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02363322-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02363322-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3060.180.469wilson
Risk in group 20.3710.2320.537wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0659-0.2730.149newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8230.4281.58log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.7450.2782log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp than on A/Current Standard of Care Alone15.2from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard of care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp
ZMapp (Trademark) + Optimized standard of care to include aggressive fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic support, and other interventions available in an optimized care setting.~ZMApp: Triple monoclonal cocktail of antibodies against Zaire species of Ebola virus
1136EG001
Group 2A/Current Standard of Care AloneOptimized standard of care to include aggressive fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic support, and other interventions available in an optimized care setting1335EG000

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
8 months, from March 2015 through November 2015

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Putative Investigational Therapeutics in the Treatment of Patients With Known Ebola Infection
NCT number
NCT02363322
Phases
PHASE1, PHASE2
Conditions
Ebola Virus Infection
Interventions
B/Current Standard of Care Plus ZMapp, A/Current Standard of Care Alone
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Results first posted
2019-05-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02363322-sae