ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02434328-sae

Brolucizumab 6mg vs Aflibercept 2mg: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Brolucizumab 6mg vs Aflibercept 2mg: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02434328-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02434328-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2140.1750.258wilson
Risk in group 20.2410.20.287wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0277-0.08790.0328newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8850.6781.16log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8540.6051.21log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Brolucizumab 6mg than on Aflibercept 2mg36.1from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Brolucizumab 6mgAll subjects exposed to brolucizumab ophthalmic solution administered as a 6 mg/50 microliter (μL) dose79370EG000
Group 2Aflibercept 2mgAll subjects exposed to aflibercept ophthalmic solution administered as a 2 mg/50 μL dose89369EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
First treatment through study completion, an average of 96 weeks.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy and Safety of RTH258 Versus Aflibercept - Study 2
NCT number
NCT02434328
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Choroidal Neovascularization
Interventions
Brolucizumab ophthalmic solution, Aflibercept ophthalmic solution
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Results first posted
2019-10-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02434328-sae