Comparison · NCT02458365-25da11f4
Intervention: Teen Choices vs Comparison: Health In Motion: Number of Participants Perpetrating Emotional Peer Violence During Follow-up
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Intervention: Teen Choices vs Comparison: Health In Motion: Number of Participants Perpetrating Emotional Peer Violence During Follow-up. Trial comparisons, record NCT02458365-25da11f4. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02458365-25da11f4
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.485 | 0.431 | 0.539 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.633 | 0.582 | 0.681 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.148 | -0.221 | -0.0739 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.765 | 0.667 | 0.878 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.545 | 0.401 | 0.74 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Intervention: Teen Choices than on Comparison: Health In Motion | 6.73 | 4.53 | 13.5 | from the risk difference interval |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Intervention: Teen Choices | A 3-session online, multimedia TTM-based intervention for teen dating violence prevention. For most students, the intervention seeks to reduce risk for dating violence by facilitating progress through the stages of change for using healthy relationship skills; daters are encouraged to use those skills in their dating relationships, and non-daters in their peer relationships, as relationships with peers serve as the foundation for experiences in romantic relationships. For victims of dating violence experiencing fear, the intervention does not focus on healthy relationship skills; instead, it seeks to facilitate progress through the stages of change for keeping oneself safe in relationships. | 157 | 324 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Comparison: Health In Motion | A 3-session online, multimedia, TTM-based intervention which targets physical activity, screen time, and healthy eating for obesity prevention. Health In Motion sessions were administered following the baseline, 6-month, and 12-month assessments to increase the benefits of study participation for Comparison schools and students. | 226 | 357 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED
- Title
- Number of Participants Perpetrating Emotional Peer Violence During Follow-up
- Description
- See above. One or more incidents of peer emotional mistreatment perpetrated during the period in question were coded as yes, and no incidents coded as no).
- Time frame
- One year
- Population
Participants who were not exposed to at least minimal risk for dating violence (see definition of minimal risk above); among 725 participants not exposed to risk, 44 were inadvertently administered the wrong measures and thus were excluded from analyses, leaving N = 681.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- A Stage-Based Expert System for Teen Dating Violence Prevention
- NCT number
- NCT02458365
- Phases
- PHASE2
- Conditions
- Violence, Bullying
- Interventions
- Teen Choices: A Program for Healthy Nonviolent Relationships, Health In Motion
- Lead sponsor
- Pro-Change Behavior Systems
- Results first posted
- 2015-07-09
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02458365?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02458365-25da11f4