ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02477696-5ebe5490

Acalabrutinib vs Ibrutinib: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Infections Grade >= 3

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Acalabrutinib vs Ibrutinib: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Infections Grade >= 3. Trial comparisons, record NCT02477696-5ebe5490. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02477696-5ebe5490

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3680.3130.428wilson
Risk in group 20.3840.3270.444wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0156-0.09750.0666newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9590.771.19log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9360.6581.33log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Acalabrutinib than on Ibrutinib64.1from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1AcalabrutinibParticipants received oral acalabrutinib (ACP196) 100 mg BID until PD, or unacceptable toxicity, or other reasons for discontinuation, whichever occurred first.98266OG000
Group 2IbrutinibParticipants received oral ibrutinib 420 mg QD until PD, or unacceptable toxicity, or other reasons for discontinuation, whichever occurred first.101263OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Infections Grade >= 3
Description
Number of participants with treatment-emergent infections Grade \>=3 are reported.
Time frame
Day 1 through 83.5 months (maximum observed duration)
Population
Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug and were analyzed as treated.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study of Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) Versus Ibrutinib in Previously Treated Participants With High Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
NCT number
NCT02477696
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Interventions
Acalabrutinib, Ibrutinib
Lead sponsor
Acerta Pharma BV
Results first posted
2022-01-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02477696-5ebe5490