ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02478359-35b9ad61

Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) vs Standard Care: Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) vs Standard Care: Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits. Trial comparisons, record NCT02478359-35b9ad61. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02478359-35b9ad61

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5170.490.543wilson
Risk in group 20.5140.4880.541wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00248-0.03510.0401newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 210.9341.08log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.8691.17log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!) than on Standard Care403from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
The 12-month Walk On! intervention included a baseline in-person assessment, collaborative monitoring of steps using two types of activity sensors, semi-automated step goal recommendations using an interactive voice response system or web application, ongoing individualized reinforcement from a physical activity coach, and peer/family support.
7021,358OG001
Group 2Standard CareStandard care patients received their routine care from Kaiser Permanente Southern California and had access to all health services in accordance with their health plan6941,349OG000

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With All-cause Emergency Department Visits
Description
Covariates included in the adjusted multivariate models were age, FEV1% predicted, Charlson comorbidity index, oxygen use, hospitalization for COPD in previous 12 months, outpatient treated COPD exacerbation in previous 12 months, length of time since acute care utilization to randomization, use of LABA or ICS, PA level and study site
Time frame
12 months following randomization
Population
ITT population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Walk On! Physical Activity Coaching
NCT number
NCT02478359
Phases
NA
Conditions
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Interventions
Physical Activity Coaching (Walk On!)
Lead sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Results first posted
2020-02-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02478359-35b9ad61