ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02482129-0bda0c30

LME636 vs Dexamethasone: Number of Responders at Day 15

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. LME636 vs Dexamethasone: Number of Responders at Day 15. Trial comparisons, record NCT02482129-0bda0c30. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02482129-0bda0c30

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.560.3710.733wilson
Risk in group 20.90.5960.982wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.34-0.5460.0101newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.6220.4150.932log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.1410.01551.29log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on LME636 than on Dexamethasone2.94from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1LME636LME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 1 week (Week 3) and 1 week of masked Vehicle administration (Week 4)1425OG000
Group 2DexamethasoneDexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution, maximum drop frequency administered for 2 weeks, followed by a tapering for 2 weeks (Weeks 3 and 4)910OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Number of Responders at Day 15
Description
Response was defined as a two-step decrease or more from baseline in Anterior Chamber (AC) Cell Grade as per Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN). Baseline was defined as the measurement taken before drug administration on Day 1. Subjects receiving rescue treatment on or before Day 15 were considered non-responders. Only one eye contributed to the analysis.
Time frame
Baseline (Day 1), Day 15
Population
This analysis population includes all subjects who received any study drug, had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment, had no critical protocol deviations, and had a valid determination of response status for the primary endpoint (Per Protocol Analysis Set).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of LME636 in the Treatment of Acute Anterior Uveitis
NCT number
NCT02482129
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Acute Anterior Uveitis
Interventions
LME636 60 mg/mL ophthalmic solution, Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution, LME636 Vehicle
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Results first posted
2017-08-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02482129-0bda0c30