Comparison · NCT02512224-673f4dbe
Parenteral Nutrition vs Enteral Nutrition: Re-admission 30 Days
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Parenteral Nutrition vs Enteral Nutrition: Re-admission 30 Days. Trial comparisons, record NCT02512224-673f4dbe. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02512224-673f4dbe
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0646 | 0.0562 | 0.0741 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0546 | 0.0469 | 0.0635 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.00996 | -0.00222 | 0.0222 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.18 | 0.963 | 1.45 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.19 | 0.961 | 1.49 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Parenteral Nutrition than on Enteral Nutrition | 100 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Parenteral Nutrition | investigators selected participants aged 20 years or older who had undergoneparenteral nutrition by central venous port insertion between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2013.~Parenteral nutrition and Enteral nutrition: Participants are retrospectively selected with propensity score matching | 188 | 2,912 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Enteral Nutrition | investigators selected participants aged 20 years or older who had undergone enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, percutaneous transesophageal gastrotubing, or ileostomy between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2013.~Parenteral nutrition and Enteral nutrition: Participants are retrospectively selected with propensity score matching | 159 | 2,912 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Re-admission 30 Days
- Description
- Time frame
- re-admission within 30 days of discharge.
- Population
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Comparison of Outcomes Between Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
- NCT number
- NCT02512224
- Phases
- Conditions
- Deglutition Disorders
- Interventions
- Parenteral nutrition, Enteral nutrition
- Lead sponsor
- Tokyo University
- Results first posted
- 2015-09-10
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02512224?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02512224-673f4dbe