Comparison · NCT02533726-d47491e4
Treatment - Optimal Turning vs Control - Standard Care: Count of Participants With Pressure Ulcer According to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Criteria for Pressure Ulcers
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Treatment - Optimal Turning vs Control - Standard Care: Count of Participants With Pressure Ulcer According to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Criteria for Pressure Ulcers. Trial comparisons, record NCT02533726-d47491e4. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02533726-d47491e4
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.00745 | 0.00319 | 0.0173 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.027 | 0.0164 | 0.0441 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.0196 | -0.0372 | -0.0051 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.276 | 0.101 | 0.754 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.27 | 0.0976 | 0.748 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Treatment - Optimal Turning than on Control - Standard Care | 51.1 | 26.9 | 196 | from the risk difference interval |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Group 2 names the comparator: standard care.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Treatment - Optimal Turning | All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who had access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning, based on data obtained from the wearable patient sensor. | 5 | 671 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Control - Standard Care | All patients had a sensor applied. Patients within this arm received care from nurses who did not have access to a User Dashboard that provided visual advisories for patient turning. Instead, these patients received standard care practices, patient turning initiated by nurses as necessary. | 15 | 555 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- PRIMARY
- Title
- Count of Participants With Pressure Ulcer According to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Criteria for Pressure Ulcers
- Description
NPUAP criteria include 4 stages and 2 unstaged criteria. The count of patients with pressure ulcer according to any of the criteria are reported.~* Stage 1: Non-blanchable erythema of intact skin~* Stage 2: Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis~* Stage 3: Full-thickness skin loss~* Stage 4: Full-thickness skin and tissue loss~* Unstageable: Obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss~* Suspected deep tissue injury: Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration
- Time frame
- Duration of ICU admission (average 1 week)
- Population
- Per protocol population according to treatment received (met minimum monitoring period (\>2h) and did not receive both interventions)
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Optimal Patient Turning for Reducing Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcers
- NCT number
- NCT02533726
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Pressure Ulcer
- Interventions
- Optimal Turning, Standard Care Practices, Patient Sensor
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Results first posted
- 2018-04-09
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02533726?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02533726-d47491e4