ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02578641-sae

Chemo + EBV-CTL vs Chemo Only: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Chemo + EBV-CTL vs Chemo Only: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT02578641-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02578641-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4170.3440.494wilson
Risk in group 20.2840.220.358wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.1330.02950.233newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.471.081.99log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.811.142.87log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Chemo + EBV-CTL than on Chemo Only7.514.2933.9from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Chemo + EBV-CTLgemcitabine+carboplatin + EBV-CTL68163EG000
Group 2Chemo Onlygemcitabine+carboplatin46162EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse events during the entire trial duration were monitored/assessed from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 13 months for Chemo+EBV-CTL and 6 months for Chemo Only).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Phase III Trial Evaluating Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) Patients
NCT number
NCT02578641
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Interventions
autologous EBV specific Cytotoxic T cells, combination IV gemcitabine and IV carboplatin (AUC2)
Lead sponsor
Tessa Therapeutics
Results first posted
2023-06-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02578641-sae