Comparison · NCT02674464-37f8c420
Standard of Care Plus (SCP) vs Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC): Number of Participants With Controlled Blood Pressure
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Standard of Care Plus (SCP) vs Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC): Number of Participants With Controlled Blood Pressure. Trial comparisons, record NCT02674464-37f8c420. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02674464-37f8c420
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.616 | 0.581 | 0.65 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.586 | 0.551 | 0.621 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0298 | -0.0197 | 0.079 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.05 | 0.968 | 1.14 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.13 | 0.921 | 1.39 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Standard of Care Plus (SCP) than on Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) | 33.6 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Standard of Care Plus (SCP) | Practices in the Standard of Care Plus (SCP) comparator group received interventions designed to reinforce and standardize evidence-based hypertension care best practices across both intervention and comparator practices. The plus in the standard care arm included integration of proper BP measurement techniques, hypertension care best practices, and audit and feedback of hypertension control performance, as usual care at each practice. Additionally, health-system- and practice-level leaders at SCP practices participated in a system-level leadership engagement intervention consisting of quarterly, one-hour calls. | 462 | 750 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) | The intensive Collaborative Care/Stepped Care (CC/SC) arm includes all components of the SCP arm and plus the establishment of a practice-based collaborative care team with a stepped-care approach; quarterly hypertension dashboard education and training; and twice quarterly coaching calls for system- and practice-level leaders, care managers (CM), and community health workers (CHWs) the CC/SC arm to discuss the interventions during their active intervention phase.~In the CC/SC approach, treatment for patients with prolonged uncontrolled hypertension is enhanced by adding a care manager and a community health worker (CHW) to deliver community-based contextualized care, or consultation with a panel of sub-specialists, or both, as necessary, to improve patient-centered outcomes and reduce disparities in hypertension control. | 442 | 754 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- PRIMARY
- Title
- Number of Participants With Controlled Blood Pressure
- Description
- Number of participants with Controlled Blood Pressure (\<140/90 mm Hg).
- Time frame
- 12 months
- Population
- We received BP data on 750 patients in the SCP arm and on 754 patients in the CC/SC arm from EMR's.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Reducing Inequities in Care of Hypertension, Lifestyle Improvement for Everyone (RICH LIFE Project)
- NCT number
- NCT02674464
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Uncontrolled Hypertension
- Interventions
Provider Audit-Feedback, Stratified by Race and Ethnicity, Blood Pressure Measurement Standardization, System Level Leadership Intervention, Collaborative Care Team Intervention, Community Health Worker Referral, Specialist Care Consultation
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Results first posted
- 2022-07-01
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02674464?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02674464-37f8c420