ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

Standard Implementation vs Intensive Implementation: deaths from any cause

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 10.09140.08390.0995wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 20.07270.06820.0776wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.01870.009750.0279newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.261.131.4logClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.281.141.44logClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to harm, for one more death from any cause on Standard Implementation than on Intensive Implementation53.635.8103from the risk difference intervalClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1Standard Implementation
Promotion, Tool Access, academic detailing + Audit and Feedback~Promotion, and Tool Access: All sites will be given access to a You Tube video that describes the tool's development (e.g., how the algorithm was designed) and a tutorial on how to use the web-site. The investigators will promote the webinar and using the tool through key local leaders. A web-link to use the tool will be placed within the lung cancer screening clinical reminder.~Audit and Feedback: Sites will be provided with reports to provide feedback on the screening and shared decision making process. Site teams were encouraged to send these reports to providers.~Academic Detailing: All sites will be offered an academic detailing approach to implementation of Lung Decision Precision. A trained detailer will travel to all sites who agree to a visit. The detailer will meet with individual primary care providers whenever possible, and groups of providers as necessary. He will present evidence for a risk-based approach to screening and how to use the tool with patients to make tailored screening recommendations.
4825,275EG000ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2Intensive Implementation
Promotion, and Tool Access, academic detailing + Audit and Feedback + LEAP~Promotion, and Tool Access: All sites will be given access to a You Tube video that describes the tool's development (e.g., how the algorithm was designed) and a tutorial on how to use the web-site. The investigators will promote the webinar and using the tool through key local leaders. A web-link to use the tool will be placed within the lung cancer screening clinical reminder.~LEAP: Sites randomized to intensive implementation will be offered participation in the LEAP program. LEAP (Learn. Engage. Act. Program) is a multi-week, online learning collaborative using systems redesign techniques to help sites identify and overcome barriers to implementation of shared decision making (use of the Decision Precision tool).~Audit and Feedback: Sites will be provided with reports to provide feedback on the screening and shared decision making process. Site teams were encouraged to send these reports to providers.~Academic Detailing: All sites will be offered an academic detailing approach to implementation of Lung Decision Precision. A trained detailer will travel to all sites who agree to a visit. The detailer will meet with individual primary care providers whenever possible, and groups of providers as necessary. He will present evidence for a risk-based approach to screening and how to use the tool with patients to make tailored screening recommendations.
85511,758EG001ClinicalTrials.gov

Harm 2

FieldValueSource
What it countsTotal, all-cause mortalityClinicalTrials.gov
Time frameClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
TitlePrOVE QUERI Project #1ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT02765412ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsPrevention and ControlClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsWebinar, Promotion, and Tool Access, LEAP, Audit and Feedback, Academic DetailingClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2024-12-31ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02765412?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.