ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT02971683-0bf16fa3

Abatacept + Standard Treatment vs Placebo + Standard Treatment: Number of Participants Achieving International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Definition of Improvement (IMACS DOI) at Week 24 Without Rescue

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Abatacept + Standard Treatment vs Placebo + Standard Treatment: Number of Participants Achieving International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Definition of Improvement (IMACS DOI) at Week 24 Without Rescue. Trial comparisons, record NCT02971683-0bf16fa3. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02971683-0bf16fa3

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.560.4470.667wilson
Risk in group 20.4250.3180.539wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.135-0.02510.286newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.320.9441.84log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.720.93.3log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Abatacept + Standard Treatment than on Placebo + Standard Treatment7.39from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Abatacept + Standard Treatment
Participants receive subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg weekly) in combination with standard treatment for the first 24 weeks (6 months) during the double-blind period. Participants continue to receive abatacept in the Open-Label and Long-Term Open Label Periods.
4275OG000
Group 2Placebo + Standard Treatment
Participants receive placebo (to match subcutaneous abatacept) in combination with standard treatment for the first 24 weeks (6 months) during the double-blind period. Participants then switch from placebo to abatacept in the Open-Label and Long-Term Open Label Periods.
3173OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Number of Participants Achieving International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Definition of Improvement (IMACS DOI) at Week 24 Without Rescue
Description
The number of participants who achieve IMACS DOI (International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies definition of improvement) without rescue medication at week 24.~The IMACS DOI is: An improvement of \>/= 20% from baseline in 3 IMACS core measures, no more than 2 IMACS core measure scores worsen by \>/= 25% from baseline, and no more than 2 IMACS core measure scores worsen by \>/= 25% from baseline.~IMACS core measures are: Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), Patient (Subject) Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SGA), Manual Muscle Test (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Muscle Enzyme levels, Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Extramuscular Global Activity.
Time frame
From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Population
All treated participants excluding participants with relevant protocol deviations

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept in Combination With Standard Therapy Compared to Standard Therapy Alone in Improving Disease Activity in Adults With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy
NCT number
NCT02971683
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Polymyositis, Dermatomyositis, Autoimmune Necrotizing Myopathy, Overlap Myositis, Juvenile Myositis Above the Age of 18
Interventions
Abatacept subcutaneous, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Results first posted
2021-09-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02971683-0bf16fa3