Comparison · NCT02996565-bd90e489
Best Practice Clinic-Based Care vs Telehealth Care: Number of Participants Who Report High Level of Satisfaction With Hypertension Care at Six Months.
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Best Practice Clinic-Based Care vs Telehealth Care: Number of Participants Who Report High Level of Satisfaction With Hypertension Care at Six Months. Trial comparisons, record NCT02996565-bd90e489. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT02996565-bd90e489
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.302 | 0.269 | 0.338 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.395 | 0.357 | 0.434 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.0927 | -0.144 | -0.0406 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.765 | 0.658 | 0.89 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.664 | 0.527 | 0.836 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Best Practice Clinic-Based Care than on Telehealth Care | 10.8 | 6.93 | 24.6 | from the risk difference interval |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Best Practice Clinic-Based Care | Patients with uncontrolled hypertension who receive primary care in clinics assigned to the Best Practice Clinic-Based Care intervention.~Best Practice Clinic-Based Care: Relies primarily on the physician-medical assistant dyad and face-to-face visits to promote:~1. Improved recognition of uncontrolled BP at primary care encounters,~2. Therapeutic action to address uncontrolled BP at primary care encounters,~3. Reliable follow-up visits to re-assess uncontrolled BP every 2-4 weeks. | 205 | 678 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Telehealth Care | Patients with uncontrolled hypertension who receive primary care in clinics assigned to the Telehealth Care intervention.~Telehealth Care: All elements of Clinic-Based Care are performed, plus a telemonitoring and pharmacist case management program is offered, specifically:~1. Referral to care by MTM pharmacist or Nurse Practitioner and receiving a home blood pressure telemonitoring device~2. Systematic home BP telemonitoring with data transmitted into patient medical record~3. Systematic home-based care by pharmacist or nurse practitioner via telephone and/or secure email | 241 | 610 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Number of Participants Who Report High Level of Satisfaction With Hypertension Care at Six Months.
- Description
Patient rating of 9-10 vs. 0-8 on a scale of 0 (low satisfaction) to 10 (high satisfaction). Developed from a scale used by Green, et al (2008).~Citation: Green BB, Cook AJ, Ralston JD, Fishman PA, Catz SL, Carlson J, Carrell D,Tyll L, Larson EB, Thompson RS. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:2857-2867. doi:10.1001/jama.299.24.2857
- Time frame
- Baseline to 6 months
- Population
- The numbers of participants analyzed represent the number of survey respondents who answered the specific survey item.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Pragmatic Trial Comparing Telehealth Care and Optimized Clinic-Based Care for Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure
- NCT number
- NCT02996565
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Interventions
- Best Practice Clinic-Based Care, Telehealth Care
- Lead sponsor
- HealthPartners Institute
- Results first posted
- 2024-09-23
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02996565?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT02996565-bd90e489