Comparison · NCT03009110-fb2bd9ec
Prophylactic NPWT vs Standard Dressing: Number of Participants With Physician Office Visit, Emergency Room Visit, Attendance at Wound Clinic, Use Antibiotics, Hospital Readmission for Wound Related Problems (Measures of Healthcare Resource Utilization)
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Prophylactic NPWT vs Standard Dressing: Number of Participants With Physician Office Visit, Emergency Room Visit, Attendance at Wound Clinic, Use Antibiotics, Hospital Readmission for Wound Related Problems (Measures of Healthcare Resource Utilization). Trial comparisons, record NCT03009110-fb2bd9ec. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03009110-fb2bd9ec
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.161 | 0.138 | 0.188 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.165 | 0.141 | 0.192 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.0033 | -0.0395 | 0.0329 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.98 | 0.785 | 1.22 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.976 | 0.749 | 1.27 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Prophylactic NPWT than on Standard Dressing | 303 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Prophylactic NPWT | Women assigned to prophylactic NPWT will have the Prevena device applied and secured with fixation adhesion strips. The device will be monitored while the patient is in the hospital to confirm that it is functioning well. The device will be removed prior to discharge, typically on postoperative day 4, but longer for up to 7 days for patients who remain hospitalized.~Prophylactic NPWT: The Prevena NPWT system is a small, lightweight, portable suction device consisting of an electric motor-driven vacuum pump connected to a proprietary foam and adhesive dressing. It is supplied as a pump with a sterile dressing kit and two batteries. Different dressing sizes are available for transverse and vertical incisions ranging from 13 to 20 cm and more. The pump maintains negative pressure of -125 mmHg to the wound surface. The device is placed after skin closure. | 130 | 806 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Standard Dressing | Women assigned to standard care will receive routine postoperative wound dressing consisting of layers of gauze and adhesive tap. The dressing will be removed after 24 - 48 hours.~Standard Dressing: Standard wound dressing is routine postoperative wound dressing consisting of layers of gauze and adhesive tape. | 132 | 802 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
Number of Participants With Physician Office Visit, Emergency Room Visit, Attendance at Wound Clinic, Use Antibiotics, Hospital Readmission for Wound Related Problems (Measures of Healthcare Resource Utilization)
- Description
- Frequency of physician office visit, emergency room visit, attendance at wound clinic, use antibiotics, hospital readmission for wound related problems (measures of healthcare resource utilization).
- Time frame
- 30 days postoperatively
- Population
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Preventing Adverse Incisional Outcomes at Cesarean Multicenter Trial
- NCT number
- NCT03009110
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Surgical Wound Infection, Cesarean Section
- Interventions
- Prophylactic NPWT, Standard Dressing
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Results first posted
- 2023-06-01
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03009110?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03009110-fb2bd9ec