ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03026790-sae

Active Comparator: Telecare Collaborative Management (TCM) vs Active Comparator: Integrated Pain Team (IPT): serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Active Comparator: Telecare Collaborative Management (TCM) vs Active Comparator: Integrated Pain Team (IPT): serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT03026790-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03026790-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3040.2590.354wilson
Risk in group 20.30.2550.349wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00419-0.06260.071newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.8121.27log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.020.7421.4log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Active Comparator: Telecare Collaborative Management (TCM) than on Active Comparator: Integrated Pain Team (IPT)238from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Active Comparator: Telecare Collaborative Management (TCM)Uses medication management approach delivered by a clinical pharmacist care manager with a collaborating physician to address common barriers to effective pain medication management in primary care.109358EG000
Group 2Active Comparator: Integrated Pain Team (IPT)Uses a biopsychosocial management approach delivered by a multidisciplinary team that emphasizes non-pharmacological pain management options.109363EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
12 months

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Veterans' Pain Care Organizational Improvement Comparative Effectiveness Study
NCT number
NCT03026790
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Chronic Pain
Interventions
Medication management, Non-pharmacological pain management, Buprenorphine-Naloxone
Lead sponsor
University of Minnesota
Results first posted
2023-06-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03026790-sae