ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03029247-671aaf8e

Daprodustat vs Recombinant Human Erythropoietin: Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Daprodustat vs Recombinant Human Erythropoietin: Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). Trial comparisons, record NCT03029247-671aaf8e. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03029247-671aaf8e

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2220.1250.363wilson
Risk in group 20.1160.05070.245wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.106-0.05490.261newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.910.7115.14log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.170.6766.98log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Daprodustat than on Recombinant Human Erythropoietin9.44from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Daprodustat
Participants were randomized to receive a single oral dose of Daprodustat 24 milligrams (mg) during 24-hour acute challenge 1 (AC1) on Day 1. Participants discontinued their current erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) therapy and were washed out of their ESAs for 2 weeks prior to acute challenge 1. After completion of acute challenge 1, participants entered in 8-week hemoglobin (Hgb) maintenance period, where doses of daprodustat were administered and adjusted to maintain target Hgb levels within the range of 10.0 to 11.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL). Participants received acute challenge 2 (AC2) on Day 57 with the same treatment dose administered in acute challenge 1. All participants were followed up for 14 days after acute challenge 2.
1045OG000
Group 2Recombinant Human Erythropoietin
Participants were randomized to receive a single intravenous (IV) dose of 100 units per kilogram (U/Kg) Epoetin alfa (Recombinant human erythropoietin) during 24-hour acute challenge 1 on Day 1. Participants discontinued their current ESA therapy and were washed out of their ESAs for 2 weeks prior to acute challenge 1. After completion of acute challenge 1, participants entered in 8-week Hgb maintenance period, where Epoetin alfa was administered according to local labelling and clinical practice guidelines to maintain target Hgb levels within the range of 10.0 to 11.0 g/dL. Participants received acute challenge 2 on Day 57 with the same treatment dose administered in acute challenge 1. All participants were followed up for 14 days after acute challenge 2.
543OG001

Outcome

Type
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED
Title
Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE.
Time frame
Up to Week 10
Population
Safety Population comprises of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Anemia Study in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor (PHI) Daprodustat-Blood Pressure (ASCEND-BP)
NCT number
NCT03029247
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Anaemia
Interventions
Daprodustat, Epoetin alfa
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Results first posted
2021-06-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03029247-671aaf8e