ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03052608-sae

Lorlatinib vs Crizotinib: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Lorlatinib vs Crizotinib: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT03052608-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03052608-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3420.2710.422wilson
Risk in group 20.2750.2080.353wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0676-0.03850.171newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.250.881.76log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.370.8332.27log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Lorlatinib than on Crizotinib14.8from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Lorlatinib
Lorlatinib monotherapy at the recommended Phase 2 dose of 100 mg, was administered orally once daily (QD) at approximately the same time of the day on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Each treatment cycle was defined as 28 days. Treatment continued until confirmation of RECIST version 1.1 defined disease progression assessed by the blinded independent central review (unless clinical benefit was still achievable), participant refusal, participant lost to follow-up, unacceptable toxicity, death, or the study was terminated by the sponsor, whichever occurred first.
51149EG000
Group 2Crizotinib
Crizotinib monotherapy at the registered dose of 250 mg, was administered orally twice daily (BID) at approximately the same time in the morning and evening (12 hours apart) on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Each treatment cycle was defined as 28 days. Treatment continued until confirmation of RECIST version 1.1 defined disease progression assessed by the blinded independent central review (unless clinical benefit was still achievable), participant refusal, participant lost to follow-up, unacceptable toxicity, death, or the study was terminated by the sponsor, whichever occurred first.
39142EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
From the first dose of study treatment through end of study follow-up (infinite lag) or start of new anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first (assessed up to 33 months).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study Of Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib In First Line Treatment Of Patients With ALK-Positive NSCLC
NCT number
NCT03052608
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Interventions
Lorlatinib, Crizotinib
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Results first posted
2021-04-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03052608-sae