ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03096314-sae

High Dose Vitamin D Formulation vs Placebo: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. High Dose Vitamin D Formulation vs Placebo: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT03096314-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03096314-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.02030.01210.0338wilson
Risk in group 20.02690.01710.0422wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00666-0.02390.01newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7530.3781.5log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.7480.3691.52log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on High Dose Vitamin D Formulation than on Placebo150from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1High Dose Vitamin D FormulationA single dose of 540,000 IU vitamin D3 will be administered within 2 hours of randomization time.~Vitamin D3: 540,000 IU vitamin D314690EG000
Group 2Placebo
A single, liquid enteral placebo dose administered either orally or via naso/orogastric tube will be administered within 2 hours of randomization time.~Placebo: A single, liquid enteral dose administered either orally or via naso/orogastric tube
18668EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Subjects were assessed for adverse events from enrollment (signing of the informed consent) through study day 14 or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first. Investigators will determine if the event is serious or related to the study drug. The rationale for this time window is the 2 week half-life of 25OHD, which helps to define the period at risk from vitamin D.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Vitamin D to Improve Outcomes by Leveraging Early Treatment
NCT number
NCT03096314
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Vitamin D Deficiency, Critical Illness
Interventions
Vitamin D3, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Results first posted
2020-01-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03096314-sae