ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03226418-sae

Group I vs Group II: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Group I vs Group II: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT03226418-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03226418-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.6250.3060.863wilson
Risk in group 20.6310.5090.738wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00577-0.3420.262newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9910.5611.75log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9760.2144.45log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Group I than on Group II173from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Group I
INTENSIVE INDUCTION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) on days 1-7 and idarubicin over 10-15 minutes on days 1-3 (7+3), or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3 and 5. Gemtuzumab or midostaurin are added to 7+3 as per the standard of care. Treatment continues for 1 course in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.~INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Patients who go into remission, receive cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours twice daily (BID) on days 1, 3, and 5. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 2-4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients treated with liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Treatment repeats every 5-8 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity.~Cytarabine: Given IV~Idarubicin: Given IV~Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies~Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine: Given IV~Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies~Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
58EG000
Group 2Group II
LOW-INTENSITY: Patients receive venetoclax in combination with azacitidine or decitabine or other standard of care low-intensity therapy such as azacitidine or decitabine alone or in combination with FLT3 inhibitor such as midostaurin, low-dose cytarabine in combination with glasdegib.~Venetoclax dose varies depending on drug interaction with antifungal agents. Given daily continuous for \>= 3 months orally. Glasdegib dose is 100 mg oral daily.~Decitabine IV over 1-3 hours daily for 5-10 days. Treatment repeats every 4-5 weeks for \>= 3 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant. Azacitidine IV infusion over 10 to 40 minutes days 1 -7. Treatment repeats every 4-5 weeks for \>= 3 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant.~Decitabine: Given IV~Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies~Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies~Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies~Azacitidine: Given by infusion~Venetoclax: oral tablet~glasdegib: oral tablet
4165EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Ongoing from initiation of study drug until 30 days after last administration of study drug, up to 20 weeks

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Geriatric Assessment & Genetic Profiling to Personalize Therapy in Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT number
NCT03226418
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Interventions
Cytarabine, Decitabine, Idarubicin, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration, Azacitidine, Venetoclax, glasdegib
Lead sponsor
University of Nebraska
Results first posted
2025-11-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03226418-sae