ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03331835-sae

Brodalumab 210 mg vs Fumaric Acid Ester: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Brodalumab 210 mg vs Fumaric Acid Ester: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT03331835-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03331835-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.02880.009860.0814wilson
Risk in group 20.00980.001730.0535wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.019-0.02860.0722newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 22.940.31127.8log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 230.30729.3log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Brodalumab 210 mg than on Fumaric Acid Ester52.5from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Brodalumab 210 mgKyntheum® (brodalumab) pre-filled syringe 210 mg/1.5 mL solution for subcutaneous injections. First 3 injections are administered weekly, and hereafter every two weeks (Q2W).3104EG000
Group 2Fumaric Acid Ester
Fumaderm® initial dose tablets (30 mg dimethyl fumarate, 67 mg ethyl hydrogen fumarate calcium salt, 5 mg ethyl hydrogen fumarate magnesium salt, 3 mg ethyl hydrogen fumarate zinc salt) \> Fumaderm® tablets (120 mg dimethyl fumarate, 87 mg ethyl hydrogen fumarate calcium salt, 5 mg ethyl hydrogen fumarate magnesium salt, 3 mg ethyl hydrogen fumarate zinc salt).~Fumaderm® tablets are administered orally up to 3 times daily in accordance with the dosing scheme in the label.
1102EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
From the first day of investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and until 32 weeks later for brodalumab and 26 weeks later for fumaric acid esters. The difference in collection periods was due to the different half-lives of the IMPs.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Subcutaneous Injections of Brodalumab to Oral Administrations of Fumaric Acid Esters in Adults With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
NCT number
NCT03331835
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Psoriasis Vulgaris
Interventions
Brodalumab, Fumaric acid esters
Lead sponsor
LEO Pharma
Results first posted
2020-02-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03331835-sae