ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

Cohort 2011 vs Cohort 2019: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 10.1490.1390.159wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 20.07790.06890.0881wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.07060.05650.0844newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.911.662.19logClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.061.772.41logClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Cohort 2011 than on Cohort 201914.211.917.7from the risk difference intervalClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1Cohort 2011
The data comprising the 2011 reference cohort were collected as part of the Collaborative Research on Ageing in Europe (COURAGE in Europe) project between July 2011 and May 2012. It consisted of a representative sample of the Spanish adult population over 50 years of age, with an oversampling of older people and a representative comparison sample of individuals aged 18-49 years. Potential respondents were selected using a stratified, multistage, stratified probability design, by clustered areas without replacement, according to Spanish regions and population size. The primary sampling unit consisted of municipalities. A number of census units (the secondary sampling unit) were chosen from each of them. Age strata were then used to randomly select 10 households within each census unit (the tertiary sampling unit). Finally, a list of household occupants was drawn up, from which one participant was randomly selected following age quotas. Institutionalized persons were not included in the initial interviews. At baseline, 4,753 participants were interviewed, of which 2,528 were interviewed in the second wave (2014-2015), 1,577 in the third wave (2010-2021) and 963 in the fourth wave (2022-2023).
7064,753EG000ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2Cohort 2019
The sample of the 2019 cohort is a new representative refreshment sample from the provinces of Barcelona and Madrid, to compensate for attrition (e.g., deaths, dropouts) from the 2011 cohort. Household selection was also multistage. At the primary sampling unit level, households were defined using predefined routes and an omission factor. Households were assigned to one of two age groups (i.e., household aged 18-49 years or household aged 50 years or older) and interviewers hand-delivered the invitation letter to the selected households. All residents in the eligible age group were invited to participate in the survey. In this first wave, 3 002 participants joined and in 2022 the second selection of participants for the 2019 cohort was conducted, of which 1 037 participants were interviewed.
2343,002EG001ClinicalTrials.gov

Harm 2

FieldValueSource
What it countsTotal, serious adverse eventsClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame
For both cohorts (2011 and 2019), data on adverse events and deaths are collected at the same time, when a new wave is carried out. Specifically for cohort 2011 adverse events have been evaluated 4 times during 12 years (2011-2012, 2014-2015, 2019-2021 and 2022-2023) and for cohort 2019 they have been evaluated 2 times during 4 years (2019-2020 and 2022-2023).
ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
TitleAgeing and Health. Spanish Longitudinal StudyClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT03343886ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsHealth, Subjective, Disability, Evaluation, Chronic Disease, Mental Disorder, Aging, Loneliness, Cognitive Decline, Well-beingClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorFundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La PrincesaClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2024-10-15ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03343886?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.