ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03442322-5660bc45

Transdisciplinary Approach vs Multidisciplinary Approach: Falls

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Transdisciplinary Approach vs Multidisciplinary Approach: Falls. Trial comparisons, record NCT03442322-5660bc45. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03442322-5660bc45

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4250.3880.464wilson
Risk in group 20.4240.40.448wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00174-0.04290.0469newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 210.9031.12log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.8381.21log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Transdisciplinary Approach than on Multidisciplinary Approach576from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Transdisciplinary Approach
This approach is integrated across disciplines and provides core training for all providers, staff members, and stakeholders, using a common language to address care concerns and support continuity and sustainability.
274644OG000
Group 2Multidisciplinary ApproachThis is a problem-based approach that draws on the expertise of individual healthcare providers (e.g., occupational therapy) to address care concerns.7001,652OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Falls
Description
Percent of nursing home residents with dementia who had falls over Months 7-12 of Intervention.
Time frame
12-month period (months 7-12)
Population
Population includes all nursing home residents with dementia in participating NHs with valid data in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Optimizing Care for Patients With Dementia
NCT number
NCT03442322
Phases
NA
Conditions
Alzheimer Disease
Interventions
transdisciplinary approach, multidisciplinary approach
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Results first posted
2024-08-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03442322-5660bc45