Comparison · NCT03442322-c7944a2b
Transdisciplinary Approach vs Multidisciplinary Approach: Rejection of Care
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Transdisciplinary Approach vs Multidisciplinary Approach: Rejection of Care. Trial comparisons, record NCT03442322-c7944a2b. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03442322-c7944a2b
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.166 | 0.142 | 0.194 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.16 | 0.144 | 0.177 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.00637 | -0.0235 | 0.0382 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.04 | 0.862 | 1.25 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.05 | 0.837 | 1.31 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Transdisciplinary Approach than on Multidisciplinary Approach | 157 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Transdisciplinary Approach | This approach is integrated across disciplines and provides core training for all providers, staff members, and stakeholders, using a common language to address care concerns and support continuity and sustainability. | 131 | 788 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Multidisciplinary Approach | This is a problem-based approach that draws on the expertise of individual healthcare providers (e.g., occupational therapy) to address care concerns. | 302 | 1,889 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- PRIMARY
- Title
- Rejection of Care
- Description
- Percentage of nursing home residents with dementia who had rejection of care over Months 1-6 of Intervention.
- Time frame
- 6-month period (months 1-6)
- Population
- Population includes all nursing home residents with dementia in participating NHs with valid data in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Optimizing Care for Patients With Dementia
- NCT number
- NCT03442322
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Alzheimer Disease
- Interventions
- transdisciplinary approach, multidisciplinary approach
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Results first posted
- 2024-08-19
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03442322?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03442322-c7944a2b