ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03485950-2d7ed1ee

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Arm vs Standard of Care (SOC) Arm: Number of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response in the MITT Analysis Set at TOC

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Arm vs Standard of Care (SOC) Arm: Number of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response in the MITT Analysis Set at TOC. Trial comparisons, record NCT03485950-2d7ed1ee. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03485950-2d7ed1ee

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7230.5820.831wilson
Risk in group 20.560.4230.688wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.163-0.02730.337newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.290.9541.75log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.050.8794.8log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Arm than on Standard of Care (SOC) Arm6.12from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard of care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Ceftolozane/Tazobactam ArmReceived IV Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (minimum of 9 doses). Patients may receive other additional therapy.3447OG000
Group 2Standard of Care (SOC) ArmReceived one of the following IV therapies: Cefepime (minimum of 9 doses), Meropenem (minimum of 9 doses), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (minimum of 12 doses). Patients may receive other additional therapy.2850OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response in the MITT Analysis Set at TOC
Description
The secondary efficacy outcome is favorable clinical response of the patients in the MITT (Modified Intent-To-Treat) Analysis Set at test-of-cure (TOC). The clinical outcome has three categories: Favorable clinical response, Clinical failure, and Indeterminate.
Time frame
21 to 28 days after the start of inpatient IV study drug
Population
Patients in the MITT (Modified Intent-To-Treat) Analysis Set

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Comparative Study To Determine The Efficacy, Safety, And Tolerability Of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam
NCT number
NCT03485950
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Other Infectious Diseases
Interventions
Cefepime, Ceftolozane, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Meropenem, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Tazobactam
Lead sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Results first posted
2021-07-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03485950-2d7ed1ee