ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT03485950-b2fc31d5

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Arm vs Standard of Care (SOC) Arm: Number of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response in the MITT Analysis Set at Late Follow-Up (LFU)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Arm vs Standard of Care (SOC) Arm: Number of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response in the MITT Analysis Set at Late Follow-Up (LFU). Trial comparisons, record NCT03485950-b2fc31d5. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT03485950-b2fc31d5

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7020.560.813wilson
Risk in group 20.520.3850.652wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.182-0.01170.357newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.350.9761.87log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.180.9435.02log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Arm than on Standard of Care (SOC) Arm5.49from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard of care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Ceftolozane/Tazobactam ArmReceived IV Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (minimum of 9 doses). Patients may receive other additional therapy.3347OG000
Group 2Standard of Care (SOC) ArmReceived one of the following IV therapies: Cefepime (minimum of 9 doses), Meropenem (minimum of 9 doses), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (minimum of 12 doses). Patients may receive other additional therapy.2650OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response in the MITT Analysis Set at Late Follow-Up (LFU)
Description
The secondary efficacy outcome is favorable clinical response of the patients in the MITT (Modified Intent-To-Treat) Analysis Set at late follow-up (LFU). The clinical outcome has three categories: Favorable clinical response, Clinical failure, and Indeterminate.
Time frame
35 to 42 days after the start of inpatient IV study drug
Population
Patients in the MITT (Modified Intent-To-Treat) Analysis Set

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Comparative Study To Determine The Efficacy, Safety, And Tolerability Of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam
NCT number
NCT03485950
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Other Infectious Diseases
Interventions
Cefepime, Ceftolozane, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Meropenem, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Tazobactam
Lead sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Results first posted
2021-07-20

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT03485950-b2fc31d5